Purpose & when to use

Clean Air Delivery Rate (CADR) testing measures how quickly a room air cleaner removes particles from air using controlled chamber decay methods aligned to ANSI/AHAM AC-1. Optical Particle Counters (OPC) and Condensation Particle Counters (CPC) track concentration decay across smoke, dust, and allergen surrogates. Methods align to ISO 29462 and ASHRAE 52.2 within our ISO 17025 quality system:

  1. Benchmarking portable room air purifiers for marketing claims — speed-specific CADR under ISO 29462 supports product comparisons across smoke, dust, and allergen surrogate types.
  2. Quantifying performance by fan speed or operating mode for air purifier design decisions — ISO 29462 decay curve fitting connects mode-level CADR to filter and fan trade-off analysis.
  3. Linking filter media efficiency to whole-device air cleaning — ASHRAE 52.2 framing pairs [filtration efficiency data](/testing-services/particle-aerosol-measurement/filtration-efficiency/) with system-level CADR for integrated product programs.
  4. Verification testing for retail claims on whole-room and large air cleaners — ISO 29462 chamber decay protocol provides a defensible and reproducible comparative basis for product documentation.
  5. Performance drift assessment for filter loading and aging on in-duct and consumer devices — ASHRAE 52.2 particulate efficiency framing documents removal rate changes with service life.

Use CADR testing when particle removal rate, speed-specific performance, or comparative benchmarking drives the product or claims decision — from portable room purifiers and whole-room systems to in-duct commercial air cleaners requiring chamber decay characterization.

Air-treatment and room air-cleaning device families

CADR testing applies to room air-cleaning devices where particle removal rate is the primary performance claim — from portable units rated under ANSI/AHAM AC-1 to whole-room and in-duct systems requiring fit-for-purpose chamber decay characterization.

  • Room air purifierPortable room air cleaners
  • Whole-room cleanerHigh-capacity whole-room units
  • In-duct air cleanerCommercial HVAC in-line units
  • Fan-filter boxDIY and modular filter boxes

Instrumentation & measurement ranges

Platform selection follows the surrogate aerosol type, target size band, and the decay method the study aligns to — each combination is scoped at study planning and logged in the report.

0.3 – 10 µmoptical

Optical Particle Counter (OPC)

Size-resolved number concentration — primary monitor for AHAM-aligned chamber decay studies tracking smoke, dust, and allergen surrogate removal in real time.

0.01 – 1 µmoptical-condensation

Condensation Particle Counter (CPC)

Total particle number concentration for ultrafine and fine surrogate fractions — selected when sub-micron sensitivity or fine-mode decay characterization is required.

11.5 – 30 m³chamber-volume

AHAM-aligned test chamber

Controlled test volume with defined mixing fan placement, sampling port geometry, and background decay characterization — sized to match the ANSI/AHAM AC-1 method intent.

0.1 – 10 µmgenerated-particle

Aerosol generation system

Controlled injection of smoke, dust, and allergen surrogates to reach target starting concentrations — lot-tracked surrogate materials with documented generation settings per run.

Test method options

MethodStrengthsTradeoffAligned with
ANSI/AHAM AC-1 chamber decay CADR (primary standard)
  • Speed-specific CADR for smoke, dust, and allergen surrogates under ISO 29462 — the air purifier benchmark for defensible performance claims.
  • Background decay characterization isolates device contribution; surrogate lot tracking and replicates satisfy quality-system and marketing-file requirements.
Requires disciplined chamber equilibration and background characterization — session time scales with the number of fan speeds and surrogate types tested.
ANSI/AHAM AC-1ISO 29462
ASHRAE-style room decay method (fit for purpose)
  • Flexible for larger devices or non-standard geometries beyond ANSI/AHAM AC-1 sizing — ASHRAE 52.2 framing supports commercial air-cleaner programs.
  • Documents removal rate under ASHRAE 52.2 framing for indoor air quality assessments and occupant-exposure documentation.
Requires careful definition of mixing assumptions — without the AHAM chamber specification, comparability to AC-1-rated products must be stated in reporting.
ASHRAE 52.2
CADR plus filtration diagnostics bundle (fit for purpose)
  • Connects CADR to filter media efficiency and seal performance — ISO 29462 framing supports integrated product analysis across fan speeds.
  • Single campaign delivers CADR by speed with pressure-drop and fractional efficiency data for design trade-off decisions and technical documentation.
More measurement surfaces than a standalone CADR campaign — adds media sample management and engineering setup time to the overall study scope.
ISO 29462
Loading and aging sensitivity study (fit for purpose)
  • Documents CADR drift with filter service life — removal rate versus load drives replacement interval decisions and end-of-life performance claims.
  • Sequential CADR measurements across loading stages confirm whether performance stays within acceptable bounds under the same chamber decay methodology as baseline testing.
Longer total run time than a static CADR campaign — scales with the number of loading stages and required replicates per condition.

Setup configurations

Every CADR study runs on a configuration matched to the device size, the target standard, and the surrogate aerosol set. Fit-for-purpose setup balances controlled background conditions — defined chamber volume, stable mixing, and repeatable device placement — with the practical operating profile of the device under test. The dimensions below are the levers set at study planning:

Device interfaces

Chamber volume selection, device placement, orientation, and fan-speed setpoints standardized across replicates — inlet and outlet orientation documented to avoid direct jet sampling bias.

Flow & actuation profiles

Defined fan speed settings and stabilization periods per condition — auto-mode and boost-mode characterization added when specific operating modes are part of the performance claim.

Environmental controls

Background decay characterization (device off) before each device-on sequence — temperature and relative humidity characterized and logged throughout to bound environmental uncertainty contributors.

Sample numbers

Replicates per fan speed and surrogate type, with repeated sequences for precision — replicate plan sized to expected variability in decay constants and the decision threshold for the claim.

Media & handling

Surrogate aerosol lot tracking and documented generation settings per run — smoke, dust, and allergen surrogates selected to match the target standard and product claim strategy.

Methods anchored to the standards that matter

Every CADR study runs inside a documented quality system aligned to the chamber decay and air-cleaning standards that govern portable and whole-room device characterization. The four anchors below define the data contract carried through to §7 outputs.

  • ISO 17025AccreditedTesting-laboratory competence — documented methods, calibration traceability, and uncertainty contributors.
  • ANSI/AHAM AC-1AlignedChamber decay CADR method for portable air cleaners — smoke, dust, and pollen surrogate protocols.
  • ASHRAE 52.2AlignedParticulate efficiency framing for air-cleaning devices — MERV-rated performance context.
  • ISO 29462AlignedInternational field and laboratory measurement of air-cleaner performance and removal efficiency.

Key data outputs & reporting

Every CADR study delivers speed-specific removal rate values, fitted decay curves, and the underlying replicate statistics — primary metrics, QA / QC controls, and uncertainty contributors formatted for product files, marketing claims support, or comparative performance documentation. The deliverables below cover the standard report; extended studies comparing device revisions, filter lots, or loading stages receive additional comparison artifacts.

Primary outputs

  • CADR by fan speed setting for each surrogate aerosol (smoke, dust, allergen) in m³/min, with mean, SD, and CV across replicates.
  • Decay curves (device on and device off) with fitted removal constants — background decay correction applied and documented per run.
  • Uncertainty contributors including particle monitor response, chamber mixing assumptions, surrogate generation variability, and background decay correction.
  • Condition comparisons with summary statistics across fan speeds, surrogate types, and device configurations tested.

Deliverables

#FormatContents
01PDF reportMethods, controls, decay curves, CADR summary, replicate statistics, and uncertainty contributors.
02CSV / XLSX datasetsTime-series concentration, per-condition decay constants, and CADR summary by speed and surrogate.
03FiguresDecay curve overlays, CADR bar summaries by speed and surrogate, and background correction documentation.
Extended deliverables · multi-arm comparability · stability · predicate studies
  • Multi-device comparison packSide-by-side CADR overlays and statistical framing for multiple devices, prototypes, or filter revisions.
  • Loading and aging summaryCADR versus load stage with performance envelope for filter replacement interval decisions.

QA / QC & data integrity

Every CADR study ships with a documented QA / QC envelope sized to the chamber setup, surrogate selection, and the speed settings under test. Verifications run before and after each test set, audited under our ISO 17025 quality system with calibration records traceable from particle counter characterization through the final decay constant and CADR result. Background checks and blank runs are standard on every campaign.

Pre- and post-run particle counter verification and calibration logs — confirms instrument sensitivity and background are within acceptance before each surrogate introduction and device-on sequence.

Chamber background runs (device off) and blank runs before each device-on phase — establishes ambient baseline and documents natural decay rate for background correction calculations.

Surrogate aerosol lot tracking and documented generation settings per run — aerosol starting concentration confirmed within acceptance window before timing the device-on decay sequence.

Replicate runs per fan speed and surrogate type with acceptance criteria on decay-curve fit quality and mixing stability — reproducibility confirmed before condition results are finalized.

Chain of custody and configuration documentation — device serial number, fan speed settings, chamber orientation photos, and inlet placement recorded per campaign for traceability.

Why ARE Labs

ARE Labs connects technical topics to practical study design, method selection, controlled aerosol work, and reportable evidence without turning technical pages into sales pages.

Reviewed byJamie Balarashti (25 yrs - cascade & inhalation methods) - Weston Schaper (7 yrs - real-time sizing & nanoparticle work)
17025Accredited testing
900+Studies Performed
17+Years in operation
300+Clients supported

Common questions

Quick answers to the questions air purifier developers, filter suppliers, and product managers ask when scoping a CADR study — surrogate selection, fan speed coverage, chamber sizing, background correction, and deliverables. The answers below are starting points; reach out if your device geometry, operating modes, or claim strategy doesn't match what's shown here, since most CADR studies involve at least one configuration choice customized to the device and regulatory frame.

Q.What is CADR and why does it matter for air purifier products?
A.CADR is the effective volumetric clean-air delivery rate a device provides for particles under a defined chamber decay method. It is the primary performance metric consumers and retailers use to compare air purifiers — speed-specific CADR by surrogate type is the standard claim basis under ANSI/AHAM AC-1.
Q.Do I need to test all three surrogates — smoke, dust, and allergen?
A.Not always. The surrogate set depends on your target standard, claim strategy, and product intent. ANSI/AHAM AC-1 specifies all three for the full rating; narrower programs can focus on the surrogate most relevant to the product's intended use environment.
Q.Can you test CADR at multiple fan speeds in one study?
A.Yes. Speed-specific CADR is a core output and the primary decision variable for most programs. Each speed setting gets its own background-corrected decay sequence and replicate set — worst-case and best-case settings are both documented.
Q.How do you account for natural particle decay in the chamber?
A.We run background decay characterization (device off) before each device-on phase and subtract the natural decay rate when calculating the device removal contribution. This corrects CADR for ambient loss and is a required step under ANSI/AHAM AC-1.
Q.Can CADR testing be paired with filter media efficiency data?
A.Yes. We offer CADR plus filtration diagnostics as a bundle — device-level CADR by speed setting paired with filter fractional efficiency and pressure-drop data in one campaign. This connects media performance to whole-device air cleaning for design and qualification programs.
Q.What do I receive at the end of a CADR study?
A.A PDF report with methods, background correction, decay curves, and CADR summaries; CSV / XLSX datasets with time-series concentration and per-condition statistics; and decay-curve and CADR bar-chart figures suitable for technical files or marketing documentation.

Standards & guidance

CADR studies at ARE Labs run aligned to the chamber decay and air-cleaning standards that govern portable and whole-room device performance characterization. Where we hold third-party accreditation, methods are documented as accredited (ISO 17025); where the standard is followed but not formally accredited, methods are aligned or conformant where applicable. The cards below list the standards most relevant to CADR testing programs.