Purpose & when to use

Filtration Efficiency Testing shows how effectively a filter or filter media removes particles across a defined particle size range. ARE Labs uses calibrated Condensation Particle Counters (CPC) and Optical Particle Counters (OPC) to quantify upstream and downstream concentrations. Methods align with ISO 16890 for general ventilation filters, EN 1822 for HEPA and ULPA media, and ASHRAE 52.2 for MERV-rated HVAC programs. ISO 17025 accreditation covers the full analytical workflow:

  1. Media selection and supplier qualification for general ventilation filters — ISO 16890 size-resolved ePM10, ePM2.5, and ePM1 efficiency grades support performance claims and purchasing decisions.
  2. HEPA and ULPA filter qualification for cleanrooms — EN 1822 and ISO 29463 penetration testing confirms H-class or U-class grade with documented MPPS sensitivity and leak detection.
  3. HVAC filter MERV rating support under ASHRAE 52.2 — generates dust spot efficiency data for building systems engineers comparing products for commercial and residential air-handling applications.
  4. Design change assessment for housings, seals, pleats, and cartridge frames — fractional efficiency and pressure-drop curves document performance before and after design iterations under ISO 16890 or EN 1822 framing.
  5. System-level filtration testing for integrated air purifiers and in-duct devices — captures bypass and seal effects under ISO 16890 or ASHRAE 52.2 framing not visible in flat-sheet media tests.

Use filtration efficiency testing when the decision depends on particle removal performance, filter grade classification, or the trade-off between efficiency and pressure drop. Applications range from media qualification and design verification to regulatory file support and indoor air quality claims.

Air-treatment and filtration device families

Filtration efficiency testing spans device categories wherever particle removal performance and pressure-drop trade-offs drive the product or compliance decision — from ISO 16890-classified HVAC modules to HEPA cleanroom filters and portable air purifiers.

  • HVAC filterDucted ventilation filter media
  • HEPA filterHigh-efficiency cleanroom filters
  • Air purifierPortable and whole-room units
  • Cabin air filterAutomotive and transport HVAC
  • Respirator mediaFilter media for respiratory protection

Instrumentation & measurement ranges

We select the test platform based on the filter class, target particle size range, and required sensitivity. Each configuration is defined during study planning and documented in the final report.

0.01 – 1 µmoptical-condensation

Condensation Particle Counter (CPC)

Counts fine and ultrafine particles upstream and downstream — primary counter for HEPA and ULPA penetration measurements where sub-micron sensitivity is required.

0.3 – 10 µmoptical

Optical Particle Counter (OPC)

Size-resolved number concentration upstream and downstream — used for ISO 16890 fractional efficiency and ASHRAE 52.2 MERV-range measurements.

25 – 610 mmfilter-face

ISO/HEPA test fixtures and ducting

Leak-tight holders, gasketed adapters, and ducting sized to the filter or cartridge format — controls bypass and defines the upstream and downstream sampling geometry.

0 – 1000 Papressure-drop

Differential pressure sensors

Calibrated manometers and pressure transducers measuring pressure drop versus flow — reported alongside efficiency curves for performance trade-off analysis.

Test method options

MethodStrengthsTradeoffAligned with
General ventilation fractional efficiency (ISO 16890 aligned)
  • Size-resolved ePM10, ePM2.5, and ePM1 efficiency grades widely accepted for ventilation filter classification and procurement programs.
  • Supports media comparison, supplier qualification, and design-change documentation under ISO 16890 classification framing.
Requires controlled polydisperse test aerosol and defined volumetric flow setpoints — setup overhead increases for non-standard filter formats or face velocities.
ISO 16890
HEPA and ULPA penetration testing (EN 1822 aligned)
  • Targets H- and U-class high-efficiency media at MPPS — generates penetration data supporting EN 1822 grade classification for cleanroom and critical-environment filters.
  • Leak scanning and local penetration mapping confirm seal and media integrity across the full filter face.
More demanding sealing, upstream uniformity, and acceptance criteria than ventilation methods — fixture preparation and leak verification extend setup time.
EN 1822
HVAC filter MERV rating support (ASHRAE 52.2 aligned)
  • MERV-rated reporting format widely used for HVAC product specifications and building-systems engineering comparisons under ASHRAE 52.2 framing.
  • Supports efficiency measurement across the composite filter area with documented flow conditions — outputs feed product data sheets and procurement programs.
Reporting format differs from international ventilation standards — a separate campaign is needed when both MERV and ePM grades are required.
ASHRAE 52.2
System-level filtration study (fit for purpose)
  • Tests filters in housings or integrated products — captures bypass, seal effects, and frame losses that flat-sheet tests cannot measure.
  • Configurable challenge particle size and flow range to match device operating conditions and intended use environment.
Requires fixture design or product housing adaptation to match the specific product geometry — adds engineering setup time before testing begins.

Setup configurations

Each filtration study uses a configuration matched to the filter format, target method, and applicable regulatory or product framework. The setup combines controlled challenge conditions, including a defined aerosol size distribution, stable flow, and leak-managed fixtures, with the practical geometry of the filter or test article. The dimensions below are set during study planning:

Device interfaces

Gasketed filter holders, flanged duct adapters, or custom frames sized to the filter format — geometry selected to eliminate bypass and match the intended installation condition.

Flow & actuation profiles

Fixed volumetric flow setpoint or a flow curve stepped across the filter's operating range — face velocity documented and verified pre- and post-test.

Sample numbers

Duplicate or triplicate filter samples per condition with blank runs — replicate plan sized to expected variability across media batches and filter classes.

Environmental controls

Temperature and relative humidity characterized and logged throughout the test — conditioning steps added when the method or filter class requires pre-test equilibration.

Calibration & verification

Upstream aerosol concentration and OPC/CPC count verified at start and end of each test set — line-loss corrections applied when sampling distances are non-negligible.

Methods anchored to the standards that matter

Every filtration efficiency study operates within a documented quality system built around the measurement and compliance frameworks that govern air filtration. The four anchors below define the data requirements carried through to the §7 outputs.

  • ISO 17025AccreditedTesting-laboratory competence — documented methods, calibration traceability, and uncertainty contributors.
  • ISO 16890AlignedSize-resolved fractional efficiency and ePM classification for general ventilation air filters.
  • EN 1822AlignedHEPA and ULPA filter testing — MPPS penetration, leak scanning, and H/U grade classification.
  • ASHRAE 52.2AlignedMERV rating and dust spot efficiency for HVAC filters in commercial and residential systems.

Key data outputs & reporting

Each filtration efficiency study provides fractional efficiency and penetration curves, pressure-drop data, and the supporting replicate statistics. Primary metrics, QA/QC controls, and uncertainty contributors are formatted for product files, procurement decisions, or regulatory packages. The deliverables below are included in the standard report. Extended studies that compare multiple media lots or relate efficiency to design variables include additional comparison materials.

Primary outputs

  • Fractional efficiency and penetration versus particle size (number-based, per test method), reported at each size channel with mean, SD, and CV across replicates.
  • Pressure drop versus volumetric flow — steady-state curves and optional pressure-drop stability data where loading concepts apply.
  • Derived grade or rating summary (ePM10 / ePM2.5 / ePM1 for ISO 16890; H or U class for EN 1822; MERV for ASHRAE 52.2) with supporting efficiency values.
  • Uncertainty contributors including counter calibration, flow control accuracy, line-loss corrections, and pressure sensor performance.

Deliverables

#FormatContents
01PDF reportMethods, controls, replicate statistics, efficiency curves, and uncertainty contributors.
02CSV / XLSX datasetsPer-size-channel efficiency and pressure-drop tables across all conditions and replicates.
03FiguresEfficiency versus particle size and pressure-drop versus flow plots for technical files or presentations.
Extended deliverables · multi-arm comparability · stability · predicate studies
  • Media comparison packSide-by-side efficiency overlays and statistical framing for multiple media lots or candidate suppliers.
  • Design-change delta reportBefore/after efficiency and pressure-drop comparison for housing, seal, or pleat design iterations.

QA / QC & data integrity

Each filtration study includes a documented QA/QC framework sized to the method plan, with controls matched to the challenge aerosol, particle counters, and flow measurement system. ARE Labs performs verification checks before and after each test set and audits the work under our ISO 17025 quality system. Calibration records remain traceable from counter characterization through the final efficiency result. Background and leak checks are standard for every campaign.

Counter zero-check and background runs before each test set — confirms sampling-line background is within acceptance limits before challenge aerosol is introduced.

Aerosol generator stability verification — upstream concentration logged and confirmed stable before downstream sampling begins for each replicate.

Leak checks on filter holders and fixtures before each test article — pressure-hold or smoke-pencil check to confirm bypass is below acceptance threshold.

Flow calibration and pre/post verification with calibrated flowmeter — face velocity documented at setup and confirmed after each condition block.

Chain of custody records for all test articles — labeled, photographed, and tracked from receipt through test and reporting.

Why ARE Labs

ARE Labs connects technical topics to practical study design, method selection, controlled aerosol work, and reportable evidence without turning technical pages into sales pages.

Reviewed byJamie Balarashti (25 yrs - cascade & inhalation methods) - Weston Schaper (7 yrs - real-time sizing & nanoparticle work)
17025Accredited testing
900+Studies Performed
17+Years in operation
300+Clients supported

Common questions

Quick answers to the questions HVAC engineers, air purifier developers, cleanroom operators, and filter media suppliers ask most often when scoping a filtration efficiency study — method selection, filter format compatibility, pressure-drop measurement, sample counts, and deliverables. The answers below are starting points; reach out if your filter format, flow range, or regulatory frame doesn't match what's shown here, since most filtration studies need at least one configuration choice customized to the application.

Q.What is the difference between ISO 16890 and ASHRAE 52.2 efficiency testing?
A.ISO 16890 reports size-resolved efficiency and classifies filters as ePM10, ePM2.5, or ePM1. ASHRAE 52.2 uses different method details and reporting conventions to generate MERV ratings. We select the method for the target market: ISO 16890 for international or European programs and ASHRAE 52.2 for US HVAC specifications.
Q.Can you test a filter inside my product housing rather than as a flat sheet?
A.Yes. System-level testing captures bypass and seal effects that flat-sheet testing does not. We design or adapt the fixture to match the product geometry so the result reflects performance in the tested installed configuration.
Q.Do you measure pressure drop alongside efficiency?
A.Yes. ARE Labs measures pressure drop with calibrated sensors and reports it as a function of flow alongside the efficiency curve. Both measurements are typically needed to support product performance claims and evaluate energy trade-offs.
Q.What particle size range can you measure for HEPA filter testing?
A.CPC-based particle counting covers fine and ultrafine particles down to approximately 0.01 µm. This range includes the most penetrating particle size (MPPS) region relevant to HEPA and ULPA classification under EN 1822.
Q.How many filter samples are recommended for a qualification campaign?
A.A study typically includes duplicate or triplicate samples for each condition, along with control runs that confirm aerosol stability and system background. We set the final replicate plan based on the expected variability within the media batch and the qualification decision threshold.
Q.What do I receive at the end of the study?
A.Deliverables include a PDF report documenting the methods, controls, replicate statistics, and uncertainty contributors; CSV / XLSX datasets containing per-size-channel efficiency and pressure-drop tables; and efficiency and pressure-drop figures formatted for technical files or regulatory packages.

Standards & guidance

ARE Labs aligns filtration efficiency studies with the regulatory and consensus standards used for air filter performance, HEPA and ULPA classification, and HVAC filter rating. Methods covered by third-party accreditation are identified as ISO 17025 accredited. When a standard is followed but the method is not formally accredited, the study is described as aligned or conformant where applicable. The cards below identify the standards most relevant to filtration efficiency programs.